[coreboot] build service results for r4795
mylesgw at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 00:23:35 CEST 2009
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Myles Watson wrote:
> > > Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken
> > > Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken
> > These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM. How can
> > there be that big of a difference between my build system and this
> > one?
> I don't know.
> > Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks? It seems a little
> > large.
> I just talked to Patrick about this on IRC - the second numeric
> parameter is legacy only, it's not used for reserving space.
./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom create 262144 131072 ./coreboot.rom.bootblock
./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom add-stage normal/coreboot_ram
./coreboot.rom: 256 kB, bootblocksize 131072, romsize 262144, offset 0x0
Alignment: 64 bytes
Name Offset Type Size
normal/coreboot_ram 0x0 stage 31764
fallback/coreboot_ram 0x7c80 stage 31765
0xf900 null 67256
The bootblock is 128K because normal/coreboot.rom and fallback/coreboot.rom
are each 64K. It seems larger than necessary, but it shouldn't matter
becuase there's still almost 64K left.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot