[coreboot] small patch for prototypes and unused variables
rminnich at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 17:10:24 CET 2009
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
> Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to do
> it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the
> prototypes by the functions.
In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway.
Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem
kind of pointless :-)
More information about the coreboot