[coreboot] small patch for prototypes and unused variables

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 17:13:50 CET 2009

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to
> do
> > it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the
> > prototypes by the functions.
> In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway.
> Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem
> kind of pointless :-)
Agreed.  I don't like the missing prototype warning.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20091027/32c35783/attachment.html>

More information about the coreboot mailing list