[coreboot] small patch for prototypes and unused variables
mylesgw at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 17:13:50 CET 2009
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to
> > it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the
> > prototypes by the functions.
> In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway.
> Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem
> kind of pointless :-)
Agreed. I don't like the missing prototype warning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot