[coreboot] [PATCH] libgcc regparm workaround
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Sun Sep 27 16:38:14 CEST 2009
>> You don't need the -( -) here, FWIW. libgcc does not require symbols
>> from
>> coreboot.a ;-)
> Yes, actually it does. On powerpc libgcc uses external symbols that it
> does not provide.
Do you mean abort()? Yeah, you need to provide that yourself, on all
targets
(nothing special about PowerPC); the same is true for memcpy(), memset
(),
memmove(), memcmp(). FWIW, any GCC-compiled code can require those, not
only code in libgcc.
Segher
More information about the coreboot
mailing list