[coreboot] [PATCH] Drop all hardcoded ram_check() calls for now
peter at stuge.se
Thu Jan 28 18:21:35 CET 2010
ron minnich wrote:
> It's a form of documentation, with some typical examples.
I think it would be better if it was somewhere else.
> So I am afraid I don't see the need for the patch -- what problem
> does it solve?
I think it reduces clutter AKA noise in the source code.
In general I'm inclined to Ack, but my only reservation is that some
of the calls to ram_check() might point to particularly strategic
addresses for some boards, which were only known to the person who
did the port. If so, it would be nice to keep that information
More information about the coreboot