[coreboot] [commit] r5286 - ...
mylesgw at gmail.com
Thu Mar 25 15:47:10 CET 2010
> > On 3/24/10 11:02 PM, repository service wrote:
> >> -extern unsigned char AmlCode;
> >> +extern const acpi_header_t AmlCode;
> > And we're positive, this always does the right thing with gcc?
> I am told that AmlCode is defined as array of (unsigned) char in
> some other file. Declaring it as some other type here is not
> valid C, and *will* break with GCC, with some options (-combine
> or LTO at least) -- it will not compile.
The biggest worry for me is incorrect execution. If it doesn't compile when
it breaks, then that's a good thing.
More information about the coreboot