[coreboot] [PATCH] Drop W83627THF, it's the same device as W83627THG
stepan at coreboot.org
Tue Nov 16 22:05:47 CET 2010
* Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de> [101116 21:46]:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:06:23PM -0800, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > Should we rename the part to w83627 then?
> That's too generic, many other Winbond Super I/Os start with that prefix:
> (and probably some others)
How different are they? Is there any knowlegde about what the letters
mean? ie. do dhg, ehg and hf share some "h" feature while thf and thg
share "t"? Or is it more or less random, or even big internal changes
like for the ICH southbridges?
> We could do w83627th, or w83627thf_g or so, but I guess it's also fine
> to just keep one of the two names.
I don't particularly like the underscore, but w83627th sounds good.
> I'll post a follow-up patch which
> adds code comments like "This code supports W83627THF/THG" etc. to
> all Super I/Os anyway to document this a bit better.
Please remember to add the change to our Flag Days page:
More information about the coreboot