[coreboot] [PATCH]BCM5785 failed with low loglevels

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Wed Oct 27 18:03:56 CEST 2010

Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > > I opted against a timeout + error, as there's no useful alternative
> > > action to do on error.
> > 
> > I think that having a timeout is pretty important, and if it times
> > out then call die. I'll ack that. Maybe give it a second or so?
> Remember it can not print anything this early.

die() should still work, right? A POST code should be there at least.


More information about the coreboot mailing list