[coreboot] Fwd: [patch] tint payload update
marcj303 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 16 23:37:24 CEST 2010
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Marc Jones wrote:
>> > As for the build things, can we not get around stuffing all of that
>> > into each payload?
>> What do you mean? It seems to me that we want each payload
>> responsible for building its own version of libpayload.
> I hadn't thought of that! Do we? Interesting.
> In a way it makes sense because different payloads need different
> parts of libpayload. But thinking of it as a replacement for glibc or
> at least crt0 then it isn't so nice to have more than one. This is
> how I've always thought of it until now.
> But ok, say we want local libpayload per payload, then I think we
> should still try to simplify things.
> Maybe provide a payload.inc Makefile stub in libpayload which the
> payload Makefile simply includes after setting a variable name or
> That's a different patch(set) though. :)
> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>
Thanks Myles and Peter.
Updating the wiki now.
More information about the coreboot