[coreboot] "WARNING: BIOS bug: CPU MTRRs don't cover all of memory" loosing 2048MB of ram
marcj303 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 00:30:50 CEST 2011
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Oskar Enoksson <enok at lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 06:45 PM, Marc Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Oskar Enoksson<enok at lysator.liu.se>
>>> I incidently put 5GB RAM in my hp/dl145_g1 motherboard (2x1g+6x512m) and
>>> the following error from Linux when booting:
>>> "WARNING: BIOS bug: CPU MTRRs don't cover all of memory" loosing 2048MB
>>> (The dl145_g1 is a dual-socket amdk8 board with four DIMM's per CPU
>>> After digging around in the coreboot code I noticed that if I changed the
>>> last line in src/amd/amd_mtrr.c the generated MTRR was correct and the
>>> problem was solved:
>>> /* Now that I have mapped what is memory and what is not
>>> * Setup the mtrrs so we can cache the memory.
>>> - x86_setup_var_mtrrs(address_bits, 0);
>>> + x86_setup_var_mtrrs(address_bits, 1);
>>> In cpu/x86/mtrr/mtrr.c the comments explains the last parameter in great
>>> void x86_setup_var_mtrrs(unsigned int address_bits, unsigned int
>>> /* this routine needs to know how many address bits a given processor
>>> * supports. CPUs get grumpy when you set too many bits in
>>> * their mtrr registers :( I would generically call cpuid here
>>> * and find out how many physically supported but some cpus are
>>> * buggy, and report more bits then they actually support.
>>> * If above4gb flag is set, variable MTRR ranges must be used to
>>> * set cacheability of DRAM above 4GB. If above4gb flag is clear,
>>> * some other mechanism is controlling cacheability of DRAM above 4GB.
>>> So - what "some other mechanism" is assumed to work on AMD cpu's and what
>>> should I do to make it work?
>>> The patch described in
>>> by Scott Duplichan tries to explain something, but I'm still not sure
>>> to do.
>> The Fam10 and K8 have the AMD Tom2ForceMemTypeWB feature to avoid the
>> need for variable MTRR ranges above 4GB. Either that isn't being set
>> on your platform or your kernel is misreporting because it doesn't
>> know about the feature.
> It looks to me like AMD K8 processors don't have this feature.
> On pp 314 of AMD Family 10 BKDG the bit is described "Tom2ForceMemTypeWB:
> top of memory 2 memory type write back. "
> On pp 369 of AMD Hammer BKDG bits 22-64 are all Reserved.
> So coreboot is wrong assuming there is such mechanism on amdk8.
The feature was added in the reg F, so without a version check there
it could do the wrong thing. If you have a rev F or later you must
have an old kernel.
More information about the coreboot