[coreboot] Boot flow flexibility changes
adurbin at google.com
Fri Apr 26 07:19:25 CEST 2013
That sounds exactly the way my thoughts were proceeding. Please
confirm you and I are both great minds. :) I hope so because my
experience dictates otherwise.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:28 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> we have this notion of timer_init() or whatever we called it on arm.
> On all platforms, timer_init could record the clock value when it's
> called, and then timer_us could report the time relative to the
> starting value of timer_init.
> And then our time would be a 'microseconds since coreboot started' and
> would still, I think, easily fit in 32 bits.
More information about the coreboot