[coreboot] Patch merged into coreboot/master: 60d84ca ASROCK Fam14 DSDT: Remove INI method from AZHD device
gerrit at coreboot.org
gerrit at coreboot.org
Sun Mar 17 19:55:31 CET 2013
the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit 60d84ca22b57ae5705c0659aa07a59a3407c094e
Author: Mike Loptien <mike.loptien at se-eng.com>
Date: Fri Mar 15 13:36:25 2013 -0600
ASROCK Fam14 DSDT: Remove INI method from AZHD device
I am removing the _INI method from the AZHD device because
it does not seem to do anything and causes errors in the
FWTS[1] (Firmware Test Suite) test 'method'. The INI
method performs device specific initialization and is
run when OSPM loads a description table. It must only
access OperationRegions that have been indicated as
available by the _REG (Region) method. We do not have a
_REG method and during my testing, I added a REG method
but it did not seem to make a difference in the PCI
register space. The bit fields defined as NSDI (Disable
No Snoop), NSDO (Disable No Snoop Override), and NSEN
(Enable No Snoop Request) do not ever get written from
their default values. And writing to these bit fields
does not seem to be necessary because I did not notice
any change in audio functionality.
In an effort to clean up as many FWTS errors as possible,
I propose removing this method altogether. I have seen no
change in operation (audio works with and without this
method) and there does not seem to be any change in lspci
or dmesg.
FWTS information can be found here:
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/fwts
This is the same change as made to Persimmon in
Change-ID If8d86f:
http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/2726/
Change-Id: Iae70c3d0af1cdaca31b206ad6daba4d38ee6b780
Signed-off-by: Mike Loptien <mike.loptien at se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2742
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer at coreboot.org>
Build-Tested: build bot (Jenkins) at Fri Mar 15 22:31:15 2013, giving +1
Reviewed-By: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer at coreboot.org> at Sun Mar 17 19:55:28 2013, giving +2
See http://review.coreboot.org/2742 for details.
-gerrit
More information about the coreboot
mailing list