[coreboot] New addendums to INTEL FSP family

[Marc Jones]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 AM, David Hendricks
<david.hendricks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Stojsavljevic, Zoran
> <zoran.stojsavljevic at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I really don't want to be rude here, not trying to be, but there's a lot
>> > of talk on this issue that is driven by ignorance. And the people who know
>> > what's going on, can't talk; the people who don't know, talk
>> :-) Twas ever thus.
>>
>> People who do know, in most cases do NOT want to talk (in some they
>> cannot), but people who do NOT know, they always talk, even they're not
>> asked to!
>
>
> Let's be polite. After all, this is an open source community forum, the
> operative word being open. Not "open when mrnuke approves" or "open only to
> those with insider knowledge."
>
> Thanks for your hard work here, by the way! I would certainly like to see
> components of FSP open up over time, however coreboot+FSP is still a lot
> better than no coreboot at all in my opinion. It also seems like a logical
> step to help vendors take control of their platforms and see the benefits
> that increased transparency can bring.

Well put, David. Thank you.

Marc

-- 
http://se-eng.com