<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 06.03.2009 19:57 Uhr, Myles Watson wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:2831fecf0903061057s3e44bbd0sa3995f648a3f8ad3@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net"><c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 06.03.2009 18:24, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:svn@coreboot.org">svn@coreboot.org</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Author: stepan
Date: 2009-03-06 18:24:29 +0100 (Fri, 06 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 3977
fix a bunch of cast and type warnings and don't call the apic "nvram", that
doesn't make no sense. (trivial)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">The change to the ROUND macro is rather non-trivial. It changes the
formula. If the new formula is indeed what you want, one parenthesis can
be removed:
#define ROUND(_r,_a) (((_r) + ((_a) - 1)) & ~((_a) - 1))
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I agree that a parenthesis can be removed, but since + has precedence
over & I don't see how the formula was changed.
</pre>
</blockquote>
gcc was complaining about missing paranthesis, so I figured I'd try to
make clear what it's supopsed to do.<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:info@coresystems.de">info@coresystems.de</a> • <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.coresystems.de/">http://www.coresystems.de/</a>
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
</pre>
</body>
</html>