<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Am 13.04.2009 06:40, schrieb Peter Stuge:
<blockquote cite="mid:20090413044006.678.qmail@stuge.se" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Stephan,
Stephan Raue wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">how i can add support for Jetway J7F5M1G5E-VHE-LF
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=374&proname=J7F5M1G5E-VHE-LF">http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=374&proname=J7F5M1G5E-VHE-LF</a>)
in coreboot with this patch,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Start by comparing the added board (VIA reference board) with the
Jetway board, chip wise. If they are using the same superio you could
try simply booting a coreboot image built for the VIA board on the
Jetway board, and it might work.
</pre>
</blockquote>
here is the first problem - Jetway seems like to use Fintek SuperIOs
now Coreboot has included F71805F/FG and the <br>
<pre wrap="">J7F5M1G5E Board uses F71806F/FG or F71872F/FG (i think F71806F/FG because F71872F/FG has a Keyboardcontroller and the Board have no PS/2 Keyboard Port). I have found at Google that 71806 [3] and 71872 [4] (both supports 11 sets of voltage sensors) with are fully compatible (except the Keyboard Controller) [1], [2] and mostly(fully?) compatible with 71805 [5] (9 sets of voltage sensor).
Can anyone include this SuperIOs or can i try this with F71805? How i can change the Configuration from the VIA VT8454C to include this SuperIO (the rest must be identical)
- i think like the creation of Jetway J7F2/4 from VIA CN
Output of Superiotool: Found Fintek F71872F/FG / F71806F/FG (vid=0x3419, id=0x4103) at 0x4e
</pre>
<br>
[1]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-July/020419.html">http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-July/020419.html</a><br>
[2]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-July/020420.html">http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-July/020420.html</a><br>
[3] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71806_V026P.pdf">http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71806_V026P.pdf</a><br>
[4] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71872F_ab.pdf">http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71872F_ab.pdf</a><br>
[5] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71805F_V025.pdf">http://www.fintek.com.tw/files/productfiles/F71805F_V025.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Stephan<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20090413044006.678.qmail@stuge.se" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">or better - because i have not experience with coreboot - can
anyone do this for me?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Maybe you can find a volunteer, but everyone is busy.. Also, trying
to do development of this kind without physical access to the
hardware kills the spirit. There are often many problems to solve,
and it is really heavy work to try to debug them via the internet.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">i have this board so i can test this.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It seems to be using mostly VIA chips. Maybe you are lucky and a VIA
reference board image will just work. We are interested in any test
results!
//Peter
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
### OpenELEC.tv ###
The free and open Mediacenter Distribution 4 you
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openelec.tv">http://www.openelec.tv</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>