The wiki is being retired!
Documentation is now handled by the same processes we use for code: Add something to the Documentation/ directory in the coreboot repo, and it will be rendered to https://doc.coreboot.org/. Contributions welcome!
This page explains how coreboot can help with various security aspects of your system, compared to closed-source, legacy BIOS/EFI/firmware implementations.
Fixes can take months before being available on non-free firwmares, if you are lucky enough to have them. With free software boot fimrwares, security issues can be fixed, and in coreboot many are.
Security fixes are usually mentioned in coreboot ChangeLog on the blog.
Note that while coreboot itself is free software, many boards still use blobs. Some however don't require any.
Because the boot firmware is the first code that executes on the main CPU, it's an interesting target for rootkits:
- The code that runs first has to load what runs next, so it can patch it. That patch can then in turn patch what's next and so on.
- The code that runs first can setup SMM. SMM is more powerful than ring0. non-free boot firmwares have a tendency to put a lot of code to run in SMM. In contrast coreboot keep it to a minimum.
Given the above, being able to know what your boot fimrware does is very important.
Existing security features
Given that, with coreboot, the hardware initialization is separated from the boot logic, many security features are implemented by payloads. Nevertheless, coreboot implement some security features.
|Can open encrypted partition||No||Yes||No||No|
Common security features
- Boot password (like BIOS password)
- Signature verification - option to boot from payload only signed images
Bayou / coreinfo / GRUB2 have "BIOS password"-like feature, using SHA-1 hashes stored in NVRAM or the (flash) ROM chip. GRUB2 can also do signature verification of on-disk operating systems. TianoCore could probably be adapted to support either, too.
Both features are in the payload domain since coreboot doesn't provide a user interface.
- RAM wiping after each boot
This is not very useful: The most interesting time would be right before power-off, which could be implemented in SMM. Unfortunately a cautious attacker just pulls the plug.
To prevent reading data after a reboot, a payload could be adapted to clean out memory. Using applications that manage sensible data sensibly (ie. wipe after use) is still a better solution.
Current BIOS issues
- Coreinfo as demo payload for coreboot, showing your RAM contents after a cold boot.