IRQ assignment on my IBM X24
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederman at lnxi.com
Mon Apr 7 00:53:00 CEST 2003
ron minnich <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:
> this seems really poor bios design:
> @mini rminnich]# lspci -v -v | grep Interrupt
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
>
> Pretty much everyone goes to IRQ 11.
>
> And a bunch of Interrupts go unused:
>
> CPU0
> 0: 3381694 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 13873 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> 11: 77842 XT-PIC usb-uhci, usb-uhci, usb-uhci, eth0,
> wlan0, Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II, Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (#2)
> 12: 360259 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
> 14: 85559 XT-PIC ide0
> NMI: 0
> ERR: 0
>
>
> Is there any reason a BIOS would do this?
The motherboard is a lousy design. Only vary rarely
have I not seen the basic irq assignments come down to traces
on the motherboard.
Eric
More information about the coreboot
mailing list