linuxbios build problems

[Ronald G. Minnich]

On 12 Feb 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Part of the problem was is that someone was using 1st stage defines
> in the 2nd stage, which is quiet unexpected.  intel_chip_post is
> possibly the one define that is safe to use both places.

no argument that it was a mistake in what the person did, my only concern 
was that so many (me too!) got so confused :-)

I love the compressed 2nd stage ... you were right, the shrinkage is very 
useful. My fallback now does log level 9 (!) and still fits in 40k!

ron