Ram initialization and small c.

[Steve Gehlbach]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Steve for a feel of my worries try compiling that code with gcc-3.3.  If
> what I saw earlier today is right it won't work because someone has decided
> that aggressive inlining is bad thing...
> 

I did discover (by accident) that gcc3.2 gets more aggressive in 
inlining if you call the top routine "main" instead of some other 
function name.  gcc2.95 doesn't have this behavior.

-Steve