romcc progress.
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederman at lnxi.com
Fri Jun 13 13:36:00 CEST 2003
John van Vlaanderen <john-at-thinman at nyc.rr.com> writes:
> Haha, I thought so,
>
> Eric wrote:
> > I have used it enough at this point I don't want to live without it
> > again.
>
> I did spend the better part of last night reading the thread, though
> that got to the why but not how.
>
> Uses registers, not stacks -- like the Perl6 Parrot VM, I am going to
> have to tell them :)
Actually quite a bit different.
Parrot will just not use stack oriented byte codes. But a call/return
stack will still be required. romcc does not use a call/return stack,
but romcc still implement subroutines.
Eric
More information about the coreboot
mailing list