[COMMIT] Infrastructure Updates 4

[Eric W. Biederman]

ron minnich <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> 
> >         pci 0:18.0
> 
> one thing I'd still like to see as long as we are declaring these pci 
> slots: why not have the IRQ routing in there? 
> 
> 	pci 0:18.o 	A=B, B=C, C=D, D=A
> 
> that way, we'd have info to build PIRQ.
> 
> any reason not to do this?

Nope.  The only reason it is not done is that no one has gotten there yet.

There are a few practical issues with not specifying the interrupt
controller an irq goes to though...

Eric