AMD Solo target : linuxbios image too big?
Hendricks David W.
dwh at lanl.gov
Thu Aug 5 11:45:01 CEST 2004
I think last time we looked at C-A-R there were problems enabling the L1
cache that was not used for C-A-R. Seven lines of cache would work, but
performance was too slow. It seems worth looking into more, of course. Did
Ollie already send you his tree?
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Jay Miller <jmiller at actuality-systems.com> [040804 16:29]:
> > Anyone know what was added to the AMD Solo image that bumped it up over
> > 65536?
>
> I suspect it was the latest romcc changes, but I don't know. Try
> lowering MAXIMUM_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL and DEFAULT_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL to 7
> (instead of 8). This will make it compile again.
>
> We should really get C-A-R in...
>
> Stefan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxbios mailing list
> Linuxbios at clustermatic.org
> http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
>
--
***** DUSA LACSI-HW *****
More information about the coreboot
mailing list