AMD Solo target : linuxbios image too big?

Hendricks David W. dwh at lanl.gov
Thu Aug 5 11:45:01 CEST 2004


I think last time we looked at C-A-R there were problems enabling the L1 
cache that was not used for C-A-R. Seven lines of cache would work, but 
performance was too slow. It seems worth looking into more, of course. Did 
Ollie already send you his tree?

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Stefan Reinauer wrote:

> * Jay Miller <jmiller at actuality-systems.com> [040804 16:29]:
> > Anyone know what was added to the AMD Solo image that bumped it up over
> > 65536?
>  
> I suspect it was the latest romcc changes, but I don't know. Try
> lowering MAXIMUM_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL and DEFAULT_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL to 7
> (instead of 8). This will make it compile again.
> 
> We should really get C-A-R in...
> 
> Stefan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxbios mailing list
> Linuxbios at clustermatic.org
> http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
> 

-- 
***** DUSA LACSI-HW *****




More information about the coreboot mailing list