rminnich at lanl.gov
Thu Mar 11 08:55:01 CET 2004
On 11 Mar 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> If the BIOS has to implement services an interpreted byte code where the
> kernel provides the interpreter at least gives the kernel guys the
> option of catching bugs, and working around them. I completely prefer
> AML over BIOS callbacks.
> Is AML turing complete?
I am sure it is. I am sure that it would be able to pass the Turing test,
it is so complex :-)
More information about the coreboot