Q: Which is used the 855pm or the i855pm code?
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederman at lnxi.com
Wed Oct 27 11:56:21 CEST 2004
"Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> >
> > I am walking through the code converting the sizeram() functions
> > and have run across a duplicate 855pm and the i855pm.
>
> my fault. Sorry, ignore 855pm.
>
> > Is there a reason we have two of these? If not can we just delete
> > src/northbridge/intel/855pm?
>
> yeah, delete it.
Deleted.
> Thanks very much for looking this port.
>
> It's worse than that. Early docs I had indicated it was the pm part but I
> think it is the GM part, so that code is probably GM code by now. I have
> not had time to go back and put that back together.
Ok. The GM and the PM appear to be strongly related so I don't think it
is likely to be a problem. It is just a pain to start updating a port
so it works and then you come to realize the port never worked.
Eric
More information about the coreboot
mailing list