[LinuxBIOS] MSI ms9185 linuxbios support

ron minnich rminnich at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 07:40:12 CEST 2006


I'm willing to help resolve those failed patches. I agreed to help MSI with
this, so I will probably try to work on this tomorrow. I do want to
understand the ramifications of these
two patches:

> Index: src/southbridge/broadcom/bcm5785/bcm5785_sata.c
> Index: src/devices/emulator/biosemu.c
before I commit them. I think that yhlu understands the broadcom and can
comment on that, and Ollie and I can take a look at the biosemu change.

It is really wonderful to have MSI involved in LinuxBIOS!

We saw an MSI laptop at the LinuxBIOS summit and I for one really liked it.
I wonder if we could look at an MSI laptop that is Turion-based for
LinuxBIOS? I know that the Free Software Foundation would be very happy to
see such a thing.

thanks!

ron


On 10/26/06, Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for you patch! It's great to see an MSI board supported!
>
> A few questions / remarks:
>
> * What is the status of the code? Is the mainboard fully supported
>    (with all devices etc), or is this work in progress?
>
> * Who owns the copyright to the code? You personally, or MSI?
>    Please add the usual GPL header to all files, see here
>    http://www.linuxbios.org/Development_Guidelines#Common_License_Header
>    for an example.
>    For existing files which you copied and modified the orginal authors
>    and license must also remain in the file, of course.
>
> * The patch doesn't seem to apply (anymore?):
>
> patching file src/southbridge/broadcom/bcm5785/bcm5785_sata.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 32.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/southbridge/broadcom/bcm5785/bcm5785_sata.c.rej
> patching file src/devices/emulator/biosemu.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 121.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/devices/emulator/biosemu.c.rej
>
>
> > Index: src/southbridge/broadcom/bcm5785/bcm5785_sata.c
> > Index: src/devices/emulator/biosemu.c
>
> Are the changes to these two files generic, i.e. will they work for all
> other mainboards LinuxBIOS supports, too? Or are they specific to
> this board?
>
>
> > Property changes on: src/mainboard/msi/ms9185/Config.lb
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > Name: svn:executable
> >    + *
>
> If I read this correctly you mark all files executable, which they
> probably should not be. I think these lines can be safely removed
> from the patch.
>
>
> > Index: src/mainboard/msi/ms9185/mainboard.c
> [...]
> > +#if CONFIG_CHIP_NAME == 1
> > +struct chip_operations mainboard_msi_ms9185_ops = {
> > +       CHIP_NAME("MSI ms9185 mainboard")
>
> I would make this read
>   CHIP_NAME("MSI MS-9185 mainboard")
> if my patch from
> http://www.linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2006-October/016449.html
> get committed.
>
>
> Uwe.
> --
> http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
> http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFQZmEXdVoV3jWIbQRAlz5AJ4iiGIdIYJ8EsVZno0MV86jAIo/2gCdG92v
> vULBtfWcUL2y2gKPA3IVzPk=
> =+6sE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> linuxbios mailing list
> linuxbios at linuxbios.org
> http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20061026/e20d7a0d/attachment.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list