On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:29:16PM +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote: > + *(u32*)(0x400)=TTYSx_BASE; It's actually an u16 per port. I don't like where this is going. I don't want LB to be BIOS-compatible, I think that would be a regression. What happened with the lbtable and the device tree? //Peter