[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] cleaned up MCP55 chipset code

Stefan Reinauer stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de
Fri Feb 2 17:59:43 CET 2007


ron minnich wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Some Guy <some at guy.com>
>>> Acked-by: Some Gal <some at gal.com>
>>> Applied-by: David H. Barr <dhbarr at gozelle.com>
>>>   OR
>>> Commited-by: David H. Barr <dhbarr at gozelle.com>
>>>
>>> Is there some blindingly obvious reason why one of these two wouldn't
>>> be appropriate?
>> Yes -- it's what Signed-off-by is for already :-)
> 
> you are assuming that signed-off-by implies commit rights, and it doesn't.
> 
> signed-off-by is necessary but not sufficient. acked-by is necessary
> but not sufficient.
> 

committed-by can be retrieved from the svn system per revision.


-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.dehttp://www.coresystems.de/




More information about the coreboot mailing list