[LinuxBIOS] [RFC] v3: dts fixes and questions
Uwe Hermann
uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Sat Jun 30 21:38:05 CEST 2007
Here's a patch which streamlines the dts contents a bit:
- Every "thing" should have an "enable;" line (or am I missing some
reason why they shouldn't?)
- Every "thing" should have the "enable;" as first entry, if it has one.
- Constructors should come before other stuff, but after the "enable;".
Comments?
Does the order in which variables are defined (e.g. ide0_enable) and in
which the constructors are called matter? I.e. is there a semantic
difference between
{
ide0_enable = "0";
ide1_enable = "0";
constructor = "i82371eb_constructors";
};
and
{
constructor = "i82371eb_constructors";
ide0_enable = "0";
ide1_enable = "0";
};
?
See patch for my proposal, but please note that it may be incorrent,
that's why I'm asking...
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: v3_dts_fixes.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2946 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20070630/61c81fc5/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20070630/61c81fc5/attachment.sig>
More information about the coreboot
mailing list