[coreboot] [PATCH] fix stage0_i586.S in v3

Juergen Beisert juergen127 at kreuzholzen.de
Fri Apr 4 22:22:30 CEST 2008


On Friday 04 April 2008 21:34, Myles Watson wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org
> > [mailto:coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Beisert
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 1:29 PM
> > To: linuxbios at linuxbios.org
> > Cc: Ed Swierk; coreboot at coreboot.org
> > Subject: Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] fix stage0_i586.S in v3
> >
> > On Friday 04 April 2008 20:43, Ed Swierk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> > > >  Also there is crossdev and just plain Gentoo, either just vanilla
> > > >  binutils ebuilds or even catalyst for a complete custom system
> > > > build.
> > >
> > > And buildroot and LFS and lots of others too. I'm not knocking any of
> > > those, but they are more complex than what I was looking for. My
> > > 50-line shell script (attached) builds a cross-compiling gcc (4.2.2) +
> > > binutils (2.17) + uClibc (0.9.29) toolchain, nothing more.
> >
> > What about a reference toolchain everybody can build on his host and use
> > to
> > compile coreboot? I believe we will out of luck to support every
> > toolchain on
> > this planet.
>
> I think it is nicer to have a black list.  Hopefully the build succeeds in
> more instances than it fails.  Otherwise we might pick a reference
> toolchain that turns out to have bugs later.

But it's easier to fix. You fix one reference toolchain and make everyone 
happy.

Black lists only gets bigger and bigger...

Juergen




More information about the coreboot mailing list