[coreboot] ADLO for buildrom
Uwe Hermann
uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Wed Apr 30 20:32:25 CEST 2008
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:18:38PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 30/04/08 11:21 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse at amd.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30/04/08 10:16 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jordan Crouse [mailto:jordan.crouse at amd.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:08 AM
> > > > > To: Myles Watson
> > > > > Cc: Coreboot
> > > > > Subject: Re: ADLO for buildrom
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what the history of the ADLO code is - any reason why we
> > > > > can't
> > > > > give it a home in payloads/ on SVN instead of living in the buildrom
> > > > > code?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. The old code was in v2's tree under utils/
> > > >
> > > > I didn't think it was too big of a deal, since it's only one assembly file,
> > > > a make file, and two elf headers. I admit it looks like a lot with all the
> > > > documentation.
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to have it live wherever's best. Who has to set that up?
> > >
> > > Its all set up - just push - I recommend payloads/adlo.
> >
> > Here are two patches. One adds a lightened ADLO to payloads/adlo.
> > The other adds ADLO to buildrom.
> >
> > The only non-specific change is an error if there is no payload
> > selected, since it causes the build to fail.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse at amd.com> x 2
NACK for now. Let's wait a bit with the ADLO part at least.
Why are we copying stuff around partially only? We have
coreboot-v2/util/ADLO already. I agree that payloads/adlo/ is the
better place for it, but we should simply 'svn mv' it there.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
More information about the coreboot
mailing list