[coreboot] r1026 - in coreboot-v3: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m southbridge/intel/i82801gx
stepan at coresystems.de
Fri Nov 14 20:05:39 CET 2008
On 14.11.2008, at 19:57, "ron minnich" <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jordan Crouse
> <jordan at cosmicpenguin.net> wrote:
>> And you know what - with all due respect to Ron, I tend to
>> be in favor of that option. Stages continue to be rather painful.
>> Just one
>> guy's opinion.
> actually, stages just define what we do in v2 now. We have the ROM
> part, the CAR part, and the RAM part.
With the big difference that we always know where those stages lived
in rom at link time in v2.
If we go back to that, and we want fallback, we will likely be wasting
many Kb of rom space again as we usually do in v2
> These are pretty much stage0/1,
> initram, and stage2. We gave them names in hamburg because the v2
> names (ram_rom for example) are confusing.
> What would you do differently? How would you restructure it?
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
More information about the coreboot