[coreboot] Interrupt confusion CK804 Tyan s2895
mylesgw at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 20:25:16 CET 2009
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz> wrote:
>> With Coreboot and ACPI the interrupt gets routed to IRQ 0, even though
>> I put 18 in the _PRT table. X loads more quickly, but there are
>> obvious problems with text highlighting.
> This is OK, just the PCI line reg is not initialized. Its used only when
> the routing of PCI is done via 8259. Check
> There is some pics which explains that.
Sorry to make you continually refer to the same place. I thought I
>> In none of the three cases can I find the IRQ listed in
>> /proc/interrupts. I would have expected to see it there.
> It means that the driver is not using any interrupts Maybe you need to load
> the "nvidia" proprietary module.
I don't really care that it's not using the interrupt. I was just
thinking that might be the problem since the factory BIOS uses IRQ 5
and Coreboot uses 18. If interrupts aren't the problem, I wonder
what's causing it to fail.
More information about the coreboot