[coreboot] Splitting out subprojects into separate repositories
peter at stuge.se
Fri Feb 27 18:23:40 CET 2009
Patrick Georgi wrote:
> > Sounds good to me. But maybe some will appreciate if the svn
> > protocal can still be used?
> Hmm.. what would that be for - really obnoxious firewalls that
> filter https, but leave "random" ports alone?
It would be for users that have a working setup and are unable to
communicate with their network administrators in the timeframe that
we choose for making the switch to https.
> > Awesome. I suggest to simply announce a date a little in advance, say
> > in two weeks, when the same process is done for the public repos.
> I could push the repos live "right now", but I see no reason to make
> them active on svn:// and move them in 2 weeks or whenever (and
> require another synchronization by users)
I think "right now" is too short time for people to make neccessary
changes, and catch up with the fact that we are making the change.
If https+repomove do not happen at the same time I think https should
come first. But the other way around is not so nice.
More information about the coreboot