[coreboot] domain vs device statictree order

[Myles Watson]

>> I guess it's not really breadth first.  It's just parents before siblings.
>>
>> I think this should be done for all the phases unless there's some
>> compelling reason not to.
>
> I don't think having different phases run in different order is a good
> idea, as it can lead to unexpected code execution orders all over again.

I agree.

> Code-wise this looks good if all phases act the same way.

Without this patch Phase1, Phase2, and Phase6 are done in statictree
order, and Phase3, Phase4, and Phase5 are done Parents before
children.

I don't see Phase1 being used anywhere.  Phase2 is handled with the
patch.  I think Phase6 should be updated, and I can send a patch.

Ron?

Thanks,
Myles