[coreboot] [patch][v2]:fam10 microcode
marcj303 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 18:50:30 CEST 2009
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Ward Vandewege<ward at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:49:02PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ward Vandewege<ward at gnu.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:00:57PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
>> >> Patch for errata 327, 344, 346, 354. Three of those are HT errata so I
>> >> hope that fixes the issue.
>> > Hmm, it doesn't yet. It still hangs in the same place, but it does a lot more
>> > iterations of that loop so I guess it gets further. Improvement, I guess?
>> > See
>> > http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dmr/fam10/h8dmr-p.cap
>> > for the old output, and
>> > http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dmr/fam10/h8dmr-q.cap
>> > for the output with your patch. Still using the much-more-verbose
>> > http://ward.vandewege.net/coreboot/h8dmr/fam10/init_cpus-n.c
>> Ah, Maybe we were looking right at it.... Bit 10 520a and 530a is
>> reserved in the C2.
>> Updated the patch. Please try again.
> Still no dice - small differences in output though:
That sucks. The difference is in the table entry number of the skipped
entry I added. I am worried that something needs to change in the HT
init that we don't know about. I'll look some more this afternoon.
More information about the coreboot