[coreboot] cbfs XIP patch

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Tue May 5 19:07:33 CEST 2009


Patrick Georgi wrote:
> The "next" field has the disadvantage that we can't simply hot-update 
> anymore, as we'd have to change data (instead of merely adding it).

ron minnich wrote:
> - NEXT pointer
> 
> All of these will work.

'next' foils the desirable property that single files in cbfs can be
updated in the flash chip without touching any other regions.


//Peter




More information about the coreboot mailing list