[coreboot] fallback/normal support [PATCH]Remove non-CBFS
peter at stuge.se
Sat Oct 3 20:03:25 CEST 2009
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> >> IMHO access to CMOS before CAR is unnecessarily painful
> > Why?
> Because you either introduce a dependency on ROMCC or you need
> additional assembler code.
I love Patrick's idea about generating macros from cmos.layout. With
that, the additional assembler code would amount to maybe 15
instructions. Far from painful to me.
More information about the coreboot