[coreboot] [PATCH] errata#89 patch for Family 0Fh Prozessors

Alex G. mr.nuke.me at gmail.com
Sat Feb 5 21:04:47 CET 2011


Can someone with commit access please commit this patch, or NACK it?

Alex

On 02/02/2011 11:55 PM, Alex G. wrote:
> That looks way better. :)
> 
> Acked-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>
> 
> On 02/02/2011 10:17 PM, Josef Kellermann wrote:
>> Am 02.02.2011 20:11, schrieb Alex G.:
>>> Erratum 89 is already handled on line 390:
>>>
>>> if (!is_cpu_pre_b3()) {
>>>
>>>     /* Erratum 89 ... */
>>>     msr = rdmsr(NB_CFG_MSR);
>>>     msr.lo |= 1 << 3;
>>>
>>> If this is also needed when CONFIG_K8_REV_F_SUPPORT == 1, then we should
>>> move the existing one out of the
>>> #if CONFIG_K8_REV_F_SUPPORT == 0
>>> so it gets executed in both cases, as opposed to duplicating it.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 02/02/2011 07:39 PM, Josef Kellermann wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes a potential system hang.
>>>> Don't know why this patch isn't included if 'CONFIG_K8_REV_F_SUPPORT == 1'.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Josef Kellermann  <mailto://seppk@arcor.de><seppk at arcor.de> <mailto://seppk@arcor.de>
>>>>
>>>
>> Ok,
>> now it gets executed in both cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josef Kellermann <seppk at arcor.de> <mailto://seppk@arcor.de>
>>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: model_fxx_init.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1503 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110205/a4c23142/attachment.diff>


More information about the coreboot mailing list