[coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation

[Bao, Zheng]

Currently the SB800 cimx wrapper code has already been checked in. It and the plain-sb700-derived code are both tested on board Bimini.
The sb800 code that support Inagua, i.e. SB800 cimx wrapper code, has already checked in.

It might be a little confusing. Hope I explained it clearly.

Zheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org]
> On Behalf Of Scott Duplichan
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:03 AM
> To: Bao, Zheng; coreboot at coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
> 
> Hello Bao Zheng,
> 
> Thanks for the SB800 work. I would be happy to ack it, but first a couple
> of questions.
> 
> 1) How was this SB800 code tested?
> 2) What about the SB800 portion of the coreboot reference code for Inagua?
> I think AMD plans to release it soon. Last time I saw
> that code, it had its own SB800 support.
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org]
> On Behalf Of Bao, Zheng
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 08:20 PM
> To: coreboot at coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
> 
> I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and
> handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will
> check it in.
> 
> Zheng
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <zheng.bao at amd.com>
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org]
> On Behalf Of She, Kerry
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:12 PM
> To: coreboot at coreboot.org
> Subject: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
> 
> Sorry to send again, forget the subject last email
> 
> I have made a little bit cleanup from the patches originally made by Bao
> Zheng,
> This sb800 code is derived from sb700 implementation.
> Release this patch is NOT to confusing people, but make other patches
> based on this implementation also works.
> 
> So this patch don't need to be checked into the tree.
> 
> Regards,
> Kerry She < kerry.she at amd.com>
> Tel:  86-10-6280-1415
> 
> 
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot