[coreboot] E350M1 does not POST

Marshall Buschman mbuschman at lucidmachines.com
Wed Sep 7 18:38:47 CEST 2011


I have access to an E350M1. I will test these patches tonight and report 
back with results.

Thank you!
-Marshall Buschman

On 09/07/2011 02:53 AM, She, Kerry wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-
>> bounces at coreboot.org] On Behalf Of perh52 at runbox.com
>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 12:37 AM
>> To: coreboot
>> Subject: [coreboot] E350M1 does not POST
>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Upon booting, I get this:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> you could try commit 0df0e14fb, that may or may not work, the
> commit
>> after
>>>>> that broke fusion boards completely, apparently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you! I can confirm that 0df0e14fb works properly.
>>>> -Marshall
>>> Frank,
>>>
>>> It looks like we have a regression. Is there some dependency on the
>>> other patches that have not yet been committed?
>>>
>>> Marc
>> Unfortunately git bisect is no help here because the commit which
> caused
>> the regression was a huge one.
>>
>> It's important that large patches are broken down into a set of small
>> comprehensible patches, each with an explanatory commit message.
>>
>> <<quote from git-bisect-lk2009.html documentation>>
>> ...
>> sometimes "interesting" changes of behavior in the software are
>> introduced in some commits.
>>
>> In fact people are specially interested in commits that introduce a
>> "bad" behavior, called a bug or a regression. They are interested in
>> these commits because a commit (hopefully) contains a very small set
>> of source code changes. And it's much easier to understand and
>> properly fix a problem when you only need to check a very small set of
>> changes, than when you don't know where look in the first place.
>>
>> So to help people find commits that introduce a "bad" behavior, the
>> "git bisect" set of commands was invented.
> Hello, All
>
> Since commit 84cbce2 cause E350M1 not POST,
> Following patches should resolve this regression problem, please see the
> attachment in detail.
> I have test it on a Persimmon mainboard,
> anybody can have a test on E350M1?
> Thanks
> --
> Kerry sheh
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110907/aeb97dbd/attachment.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list