[coreboot] Moving gerrit to an separate mailing list

Антон Кочков anton.kochkov at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 20:40:47 CEST 2012


Yes, I agree that it can help search important messages, without tons of
gerrit notifications.

Best regards,
Anton Kochkov.



On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Oliver Schinagl <oliver at schinagl.nl>wrote:

> As a lurker, mostly anyway, I wholeheartedly agree. And I think for the
> 'you can set up a filter' group, I think the opposite is true. You can just
> setup a filter for the gerrit mails to put mails into the same directory I
> suppose too :)
>
> Oliver
>
>
> On 08/08/12 23:28, Alex G. wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I've brought this up today on IRC. My main argument is that the
>> coreboot mailing list should be a place for discussion, for newcomers
>> asking for help, talking about the future of the project, etc.
>> Definitely more for discussion and less for patch review.
>>
>> We have gerrit for patch review. Some (actually, a lot) of people
>> prefer to do their reviews by replying to the gerrit emails. It's
>> awesome to have this option. The more the merrier, right? Right.
>>
>> Back in the days -- I mean waaaay back, think patchwork and svn --
>> doing patch review on the list, with some deficiencies, worked fine.
>> We switched to git and gerrit. We eventually got to the problem that
>> gerrit traffic accounts for most of the traffic on the mailing list.
>> It makes the list irritatingly clobbered for some people, to the point
>> they just stop using it.
>>
>> The argument from the "I like gerrit in the mailinglist" camp is
>> "setting up your own filter to keep out gerrit message is easy". We
>> can't really force people to do this. They (myself included) would
>> rather stoThp using the mailing list.
>>
>> All I've said and refuted above are arguments and rants we like to use
>> to tease each other. I strongly believe that it makes sense, now more
>> than ever, to separate development and discussion traffic into two
>> separate lists. I hope you all agree.
>>
>> Alex
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQItoNAAoJEL0kPH**NPXJJK+UIP/2yVfa/**UziIDeQRJdhhUOs1C
>> UlGji9eLHw4rPxm9NS+3n+**s3bmQDdnOMZkOZ0mbXCO/**ufTCZurbZ7uOlDQasTYtt
>> rPyU5GeMnILhH159ZIAo8KBI53HrBH**+**RdxOyxY0gVvSw5Vb2Ye4LVCTvrfDIZ**Jo3
>> p+**h7aPeAaR8mApwo24PAqJX9NDYZjytf**uOFZ91Jw8YS5BXykH8oa8Xj32ezqt7**fV
>> lxOqew7UjNdVT26aCuHnTqlPYUw/**Nl97iluWrebd8Rre6PLai03dxXqVlv**gHHVXJ
>> UzJFflwAn4gEjnYrOfd4qu/**sCkWJkCQDfYx/**DAiJtkPjUeY1FNw1Dnibsi6mP+F3
>> IleLl/**SWxv21UnZM6OJ999CxYTdXD2sNytlM**65d67UniGfeN6v1ARPZG0l2FzsRC
>> PfUhrcPKryAsVCf4otWI64QUT0r0Kg**xU6qUdX6ZOvFerKcE+**ono8ERJCL4v9TBB+
>> DVJGV2Dil+67FPzPriRhcLufPfQ14+**B8BRNcFYbYOkmgjBtRmrZk/**WvaEU5uVvII
>> sbXbEzfSKrCKGr/**K00XPRti0CRg7wn6MVeVsLTxvA5HMI**kuGxd9FfmG9EPrC0JXZ
>> tljwICM4AJkbQ6EkDg2Z66SUWnPBtf**iCLNyPs8IfK5rfYkhkreqnWRtwxl8U**a7SE
>> Lk13bwHJ/Jyf5r3RDAJU
>> =543W
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> http://www.coreboot.org/**mailman/listinfo/coreboot<http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20120824/11ba9816/attachment.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list