[coreboot] Any plans to fix payload builds on 64-bit machines?

Sean McNeil seanmcneil3 at gmail.com
Thu May 22 04:21:15 CEST 2014


OK, so what you are saying is that CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN is obsolete and 
no longer supported. Can it be removed from coreboot then?

Cheers,
Sean

On 05/22/2014 02:42 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Sean McNeil <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Are you bullding on 64-bit machine and have:
>
>
>     CONFIG_COMPILER_GCC=y
>     CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN=y
>
>     ?
>
>
> CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN should not be used in most cases. What does your 
> .xcompile file look like?
>
> I'm building on a 64-bit host using the crossgcc toolchain. Try 
> running the buildgcc script in util/crossgcc, then rm -f .xcompile and 
> run make and see if that helps.
>
> For reference, here are my .xcompile and .config files as well as the 
> output from make.
>> xcompile.txt 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNLVhwSHh4V0VWY28/edit?usp=drive_web>
> ​​
> config.txt 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNZ2hEcENPQ2kwSHM/edit?usp=drive_web>
> ​​
> make.txt 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNY1phV0c4c0MtM0U/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>
>     arch/x86/exec.S:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous
>     definition
>      /*
>      ^
>     arch/x86/exec.S: Assembler messages:
>     arch/x86/exec.S:43: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:45: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:53: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:54: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:61: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:62: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:70: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:73: Error: operand type mismatch for `call'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:81: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:91: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:92: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:93: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>     arch/x86/exec.S:97: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>     make[2]: *** [build/arch/x86/exec.libc.o] Error 1
>     make[1]: *** [libpayload] Error 2
>     make: *** [filo] Error 2
>
>
>
>     On 05/21/2014 10:36 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
>>     On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Sean McNeil
>>     <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have
>>         now caused payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on
>>         X86_64 machines. Is anyone working to fix this?
>>
>>
>>     I just tried building images with each of those as payloads and
>>     they seemed to compile fine for me. Try "rm -f .xcompile" before
>>     compiling and see if that helps.
>>
>>     If that doesn't work, can you post more details such as the git
>>     version you're on and output of "make" ?
>>
>>     -- 
>>     David Hendricks (dhendrix)
>>     Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> David Hendricks (dhendrix)
> Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20140522/1944c67f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list