[coreboot] Any plans to fix payload builds on 64-bit machines?
Sean McNeil
seanmcneil3 at gmail.com
Thu May 22 04:21:15 CEST 2014
OK, so what you are saying is that CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN is obsolete and
no longer supported. Can it be removed from coreboot then?
Cheers,
Sean
On 05/22/2014 02:42 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Sean McNeil <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com
> <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Are you bullding on 64-bit machine and have:
>
>
> CONFIG_COMPILER_GCC=y
> CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN=y
>
> ?
>
>
> CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN should not be used in most cases. What does your
> .xcompile file look like?
>
> I'm building on a 64-bit host using the crossgcc toolchain. Try
> running the buildgcc script in util/crossgcc, then rm -f .xcompile and
> run make and see if that helps.
>
> For reference, here are my .xcompile and .config files as well as the
> output from make.
>
> xcompile.txt
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNLVhwSHh4V0VWY28/edit?usp=drive_web>
>
> config.txt
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNZ2hEcENPQ2kwSHM/edit?usp=drive_web>
>
> make.txt
> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNY1phV0c4c0MtM0U/edit?usp=drive_web>
>
>
>
> arch/x86/exec.S:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous
> definition
> /*
> ^
> arch/x86/exec.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/x86/exec.S:43: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:45: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:53: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:54: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:61: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:62: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:70: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
> arch/x86/exec.S:73: Error: operand type mismatch for `call'
> arch/x86/exec.S:81: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
> arch/x86/exec.S:91: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
> arch/x86/exec.S:92: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
> arch/x86/exec.S:93: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
> arch/x86/exec.S:97: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
> make[2]: *** [build/arch/x86/exec.libc.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [libpayload] Error 2
> make: *** [filo] Error 2
>
>
>
> On 05/21/2014 10:36 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Sean McNeil
>> <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have
>> now caused payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on
>> X86_64 machines. Is anyone working to fix this?
>>
>>
>> I just tried building images with each of those as payloads and
>> they seemed to compile fine for me. Try "rm -f .xcompile" before
>> compiling and see if that helps.
>>
>> If that doesn't work, can you post more details such as the git
>> version you're on and output of "make" ?
>>
>> --
>> David Hendricks (dhendrix)
>> Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
>
>
>
>
> --
> David Hendricks (dhendrix)
> Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20140522/1944c67f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the coreboot
mailing list