[coreboot] Does the Core2Quad Mobile Q9100 require microcode updates?

[Timothy Pearson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/09/2017 11:36 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:23 AM Taiidan at gmx.com <mailto:Taiidan at gmx.com>
> <Taiidan at gmx.com <mailto:Taiidan at gmx.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 01/08/2017 06:50 PM, Daniel Kulesz via coreboot wrote:
> 
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > for the record: I had the Q9000 (not Q9100) running in my Thinkpad
>     T500 for a few weeks now without microcode updates and did not
>     encounter any issues so far.
> 
> 
> absence of proof is not proof of absence. 
> 

I would personally be very wary of running Intel CPUs without microcode
updates.  Intel relies heavily on that "patch after ship" feature to
iron out serious bugs (i.e. privilege escalation) in their hardware.

- -- 
Timothy Pearson
Raptor Engineering
+1 (415) 727-8645 (direct line)
+1 (512) 690-0200 (switchboard)
https://www.raptorengineering.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYc8sOAAoJEK+E3vEXDOFb/YwH/AqhMYlwtUsEAOVAg1dRmGss
wld98lITvh9gRv2vDPUxNrA8S2rhV8gE6OyQLn8EskyTRMNl8Wts9HR9gVBgPDO2
+mk6CQTVbWy7CBT4MZmGsJfx61KT+5valJCvH63RVciLPIY4v97w2KVPn1FE7IqN
AlCPBZDuxvVvBbRFKepygb9v75Nse6yGt1f7DHdwasAOnKGxEr+kSqMDjCNIM7D7
p4Sh5u8WzBT/3+fYm4jViskZrPhKdlo6LLQcggrlurPeAItvccm3acULGkE2FeRD
+R/Y984vIaS+qlGfkh+Es8Xo4xbeXDJQzIruifN4unOD295txwsFdJ/muSXYpsk=
=eXl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----