[flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware.

[RayeR]

Hi,
sorry for delay, still busy...
Today I tested flashrom on my PC (P31/ICH7) with my SPI prog & Macronix 
MX25L1605 chip.
It seems to work OK but noticably slower than my SPIPGM. E.g. reading is 
guess 2x longer but
erase was extremely long ~3min vs 10sec. Well I use chip erase 
instruction to do it fastest
as possible and flashrom probably erase sector by sector... Also it 
would be good to add
some progress indicator (it's stupid when looking at "wait..." message 
several minutes and
tempting to hit ctrl-c/reset :)

Martin

--------------------------------------------------

flashrom v0.9.2-r1039 on MS-DOS 7 (i686), built with libpci 3.1.5, GCC 
4.3.2, little endian
flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org

Calibrating delay loop... OS timer resolution is 50000 usecs, 3178M 
loops per second, 10 myus = 0 us, 100 myus = 0 us, 1000 myus = 0 us, 
10000 myus = 0 us, 200000 myus = 220000 us, OK.
Initializing rayer_bitbang_spi programmer
Using port 0x378 as I/O base for parallel port access.
...
Probing for Macronix MX25L1605, 2048 KB: probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 
0xc2, id2 0x2015
Chip status register is 00
Chip status register: Status Register Write Disable (SRWD) is not set
Chip status register: Bit 6 is not set
Chip status register: Bit 5 / Block Protect 3 (BP3) is not set
Chip status register: Bit 4 / Block Protect 2 (BP2) is not set
Chip status register: Bit 3 / Block Protect 1 (BP1) is not set
Chip status register: Bit 2 / Block Protect 0 (BP0) is not set
Chip status register: Write Enable Latch (WEL) is not set
Chip status register: Write In Progress (WIP/BUSY) is not set
Found chip "Macronix MX25L1605" (2048 KB, SPI) at physical address 
0xffe00000.
...
===
This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: ERASE
The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development
version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version,
please email a report to flashrom at flashrom.org if any of the above 
operations
work correctly for you with this flash part. Please include the flashrom
output with the additional -V option for all operations you tested (-V, -Vr,
-Vw, -VE), and mention which mainboard or programmer you tested.
Thanks for your help!
===
No operations were specified.


Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>>> I found a bug in the bitbanging SPI core (buffer confusion) and fixed
>>> it.
>>> This version also reduces reach chunk size to 256 bytes instead of 65536
>>> bytes. That makes buffer management more efficient (only one round of
>>> memory allocations).
>>>
>>>        
>> I did't tested lpt-spi yet, I'll have to prepare some flash chip first...
>>      
> It would be cool if you could test the lpt-spi code. New flashrom.exe is
> available at
> http://khepri.openbios.org/~idwer/flashrom/r1039-patchwork-1441/
>
> flashrom -p rayer_bitbang_spi -V
>
>
> Regards,
> Carl-Daniel
>