GCC 3.2 ABI changes

Ronald G Minnich rminnich at lanl.gov
Mon Oct 21 20:51:00 CEST 2002

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote:

> gcc 2.96 is not a real release, more of a redhat branch off the 3.0 dev tree
> that gnu disavows.  There are notes somewhere about this but I couldn't
> quickly find the link.  I would consider anything that 2.96 does or does not
> do, to be a laboratory curiosity.  Can you compile a linux kernel with
> either 2.96 or 3.2?

I understand. But linuxbios has worked fine for several years on several
platforms with several gcc versions. Something bad has happened in 3.2
which we'll have to figure out.


More information about the coreboot mailing list