[LinuxBIOS] Intel SE440BX support

Uwe Hermann uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Sat Mar 31 04:04:45 CEST 2007

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:03:00PM -0400, Richard Smith wrote:
> >>I'm not sure. I recently tested another 440BX board using the v1 code
> >>(Tyan S1846). It got to the point where it says "ELF loader by Eric
> >>Biederman" (or so). That looks like the RAM init passed just fine,
> >>right? Can somebody confirm that?
> I _know_ V1 used to work. I had a product at Bitworks based on it.  At 
> least it worked for the Bitworks IMS board.  If you pull V1 to test then 
> I recommend that you use older gcc's and tweak the makefile to use them. 
>  I think you may need to use gcc-2.95 or gcc 3.3

Do you think that makes a difference? I used gcc 4.1.2. I had to fix the
code a bit to make it compile, but it _did_ compile. Apart from that, is
there another reason to use an older compiler?

http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20070331/b40e7a4d/attachment.sig>

More information about the coreboot mailing list