[coreboot] Time for a new project
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Sun Apr 13 01:06:01 CEST 2008
On 13.04.2008 01:06, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 11/04/08 16:43 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
>> one simple suggestion. Your types are 32 bits. But the type numbers
>> are things like
>> 1, 2, 3 etc:
>> I think it's worth it to bite the bulet and use more than the 3 lowest
>> bits of the 32 bits, for several reasons:
>> 1. it's easier to detect a bogus type if you use more bits, and bogus
>> type detection is good for bogus problems.
>> 2. With a jtag debugger, it's easier to verify that it really is a
>> type and not just the number '1', etc.
>> 3. use those bits! They're there for a reason :-)
>> So, ignore me if you will, but how about
>> 'BSS '
> I dig this. We will make it so. I think we should also force all the
> header members to be little endian to avoid issues later on with
More information about the coreboot