[coreboot] Romfs -> cbfs conversion

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Wed Apr 15 23:50:20 CEST 2009

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Myles Watson wrote:
>> >> It looks like there are still many references to romfs in src/lib/.
>> >
>> > Hm? grep gives me .svn/text-base/romfs.c.svn-base but nothing else.
>> > What files do you see?
>> myles at orangutan:svn$ grep -Ir romfs src/lib/ | grep -v svn | head
>> src/lib/romfs.c:#include <romfs.h>
> Thanks! I had deleted but not committed the delete.
>> > Can someone comment on whether it's simply safe to change that to
>> > a fixed coreboot.cbfs filename?
>> I think we should just make it output coreboot.rom and forget the
>> fs extension.  There's no reason to confuse people with two output
>> files based on a config option.
> I think there is, if the file format changes. If the contents is
> always the same type I agree it's better to have only one name.

In this case the difference is that one doesn't have a format.  In
both cases the bootblock is in the same place and the code inside the
image has to know where everything else is.


More information about the coreboot mailing list