[coreboot] alternative issue tracking systems: InDefero or Redmine (was: Re: RFC: a "forge" for our various subprojects)
patrick at georgi-clan.de
Thu Feb 26 09:43:20 CET 2009
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:36:16 +0100, Paul Menzel
<paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> and I do not have experience with them myself.
Redmine has three disadvantages (which are probably related):
1. It's ruby-on-rails. We don't use that framework on our servers yet, so
there might be quite some work involved to make it fit our configuration
2. It seems to have performance issues (eg.
3. rails doesn't seem stable (can't say much about its execution qualities,
but its APIs seem to be rather fluid). I'd like to avoid a maintenance
That's why I didn't look any closer at implementing it, when there are more
obvious choices. Of course, if there's some important feature that indefero
lacks (and can't provide), I'd try.
More information about the coreboot