[coreboot] cbfs XIP patch

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Tue May 5 19:07:33 CEST 2009

Patrick Georgi wrote:
> The "next" field has the disadvantage that we can't simply hot-update 
> anymore, as we'd have to change data (instead of merely adding it).

ron minnich wrote:
> - NEXT pointer
> All of these will work.

'next' foils the desirable property that single files in cbfs can be
updated in the flash chip without touching any other regions.


More information about the coreboot mailing list